top of page
image.png
image.png
image.png

FDA’s New RDEP: Not Just Clinical Data Matters
By Dr. Nathalie Machluf | October 2025

FDA’s New RDEP: Not Just Clinical Data Matters
By Dr. Nathalie Machluf | October 2025

FDA’s New RDEP: Not Just Clinical Data Matters
By Dr. Nathalie Machluf | October 2025

image.png

FDA Pre-IND Meeting: Not Just a Checkbox — A Strategic Tool to Reduce Time to Market

By Dr. Nathalie Machluf | March 2026

 

Early drug development is a critical phase in which key scientific and regulatory decisions can significantly influence the overall development program. Among the early regulatory interactions available to sponsors, the pre-IND meeting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) represents a particularly important strategic regulatory milestone.                                      

3 Strategic Objectives

This meeting should not be viewed as a procedural formality. When approached strategically, the pre-IND meeting should aim to achieve three key outcomes:

​

  •  Confirm development readiness

Ensure that integrated nonclinical, translational, and CMC programs have generated (or will generate through planned studies) a sufficiently robust package to support first-in-human clinical evaluation. ​

  •  Evaluate the Phase I study design

Discuss the starting dose, escalation strategy, and safety mitigation measures within the context of the overall clinical development plan.

  • Clarify the regulatory pathway

Obtain feedback from the FDA on development strategy, regulatory expectations, and potential pathways that could facilitate development.

When properly prepared and strategically framed, the pre-IND meeting can provide substantial value to sponsors by clarifying regulatory expectations and strengthening the overall development strategy. In particular, a well-prepared pre-IND meeting enables sponsors to:

​

  • Validate the scientific rationale — Confirm that clinical development is supported by robust scientific evidence.

  • Ensure decision-enabling studies — Help planned studies generate meaningful data.

  • Identify potential vulnerabilities early — Detect gaps or weaknesses before they affect development timelines.

  • Reduce clinical hold probability — Proactively resolve regulatory questions and gaps to prevent holds during IND review.

  • Obtain clear and actionable FDA feedback — Confirm alignment on clinical and regulatory expectations for the intended indication in the target population.

 

As a result, the likelihood of a successful IND review outcome is increased, reducing the risk of unnecessary development delays and supporting an optimal program trajectory.​​

5 Key Benefits for Sponsors​​

 4 Common Risk Areas​

While preparing for a pre-IND meeting, sponsors should also be aware of common issues frequently raised during these interactions. Typical concerns include:

   

  • CMC uncertainties — Process reproducibility, product comparability, or analytical testing issues

  • Insufficient nonclinical support — Data gaps affecting the safety rationale for first-in-human exposure.

  • Weak starting dose justification — Inadequate rationale for dose selection or escalation scheme.

  •  Clinical trial design concerns — Study population, endpoints, safety monitoring, or stopping rules.

 

Paying close attention to these aspects when planning and preparing for a pre-IND meeting ensures productive discussions and fosters a collaborative relationship with the regulator, based on scientific rigor and mutual trust.​​

CONCLUSION

​The pre-IND meeting is the first major checkpoint for regulatory and scientific alignment with the FDA, laying the foundation for a successful short- and long-term development strategy and supporting efficient program execution to achieve timely market access.

​

bottom of page